Dissertação

URI Permanente para esta coleçãohttps://repositorio.cesupa.br/handle/prefix/14

Navegar

Navegando Dissertação por Orientador "Furlaneto, Ismari Perini"

Filtrar resultados informando as primeiras letras
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    Elaboração e validação de protocolo de avaliação de competências clínicas para residentes do Programa Multiprofissional de Urgência e Emergência
    (Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2022) Lameira, Vanessa Cristiny Coelho; Furlaneto, Ismari Perini; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9542085122721945
    The Multiprofessional Residency in Health (RMS) is a lato sensu postgraduate course and aims to train professionals to work in the SUS in a different way, as it develops interdisciplinary construction, teamwork and the reorientation of logics in these individuals. techno-assistance. Each course has its peculiarity, but assessment is an integral part of the teaching process. The evaluation of the residents must take place through the interaction between educators and the student, in a procedural way, seeking to identify problems that arise during the teaching-learning process and to solve them. The present study aimed to develop and validate a protocol to assess the clinical competences of residents of the Multiprofessional Urgency and Emergency Residency Program. This is a methodological study, of an applied nature, which included bibliographic research and a quantitative approach. The project was considered by the Research Ethics Committee of the University Center of the State of Pará (CESUPA) and approved under Nº 4,815,821, CAAE: 47940821.0.0000.5169. Data collection started only after approval, and the signing of the Free and Informed Consent Term (ICF) by the research participants. The individuals were studied respecting the norms of research involving human beings, according to Resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council, the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki. The target population of this study consisted of current preceptors and residents of the Trauma Urgency and Emergency Multiprofessional Residency Program, in addition to other professionals identified with expertise in the area (judges), as they constitute the public that uses the instrument to evaluate (preceptors) or to monitor their performance during the course (residents). The collected data were entered into an electronic spreadsheet using the Microsoft Office Excel 2019 and BioEstat 5.5 programs, and results with p≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. As the instrument was validated in relation to the proposed item (content) in the first evaluation round, obtaining an overall S-CVI of 0.99, a new evaluation was not required from the judges. The overall objective was successfully achieved. It is concluded, therefore, that this study contributed significantly to the evaluative practice of residents, carried out by preceptors, clarifying for residents and preceptors the items evaluated, in an objective and transparent way.
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    Produção e validação de e-book para a atuação em pronto atendimento no contexto do Programa de Residência Multiprofissional de Urgência e Emergência no trauma
    (Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2021) Costa, Lorena de Almeida; Furlaneto, Ismari Perini; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9542085122721945; Teixeira, Renato da Costa; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3506765836592906; Góes Júnior, Adenauer Marinho de Oliveira; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4029653381282393; Carvalho, Ana Emília Vita; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1981562999898097
    Objective: to produce and validate an e-book for multidisciplinary action to critically ill patients in Emergency Care in the context of the Emergency and Emergency Multidisciplinary Residency Program in Trauma of the Metropolitan Hospital of Urgency and Emergency. Method: two questionnaires were applied to support the development of the e-book, it was a questionnaire with closed questions containing a brief characterization of the participants, professional training, higher degree, in addition to a question about their degree of satisfaction with theoretical knowledge -practical in the area covered, classified on a 4-point Likert scale, namely: 1=dissatisfied or 2=not very satisfied or 3=satisfied or 4=very satisfied or not applicable. The last question indicated the themes that were considered essential for multidisciplinary training, as well as a space for comments. Results: 31 volunteers participated in the study, from the areas of Physiotherapy (58.07%), Nursing (16.13%), Psychology (16.13%), Speech Therapy (6.45%) and Occupational Therapy (3.22%). Most residents graduated from the Program and had the specialization as the highest academic degree. As for the degree of satisfaction in relation to theoretical-practical knowledge in the care of critically ill patients in the Emergency Room (AP), 38.71% were little satisfied, 25.81% very satisfied, 25.81% satisfied and 3.22% revealed themselves dissatisfied; 6.45% answered that the question “was not applicable” to you. Regarding the contents listed by the participants as essential for multidisciplinary work in AP, 'Critical Patient Assessment and Scales' was chosen by 12.90%, those referring to 'Cardiorespiratory Arrest' by 41.93% and those referring to 'Insufficiency Respiratory' listed by 48.39%. Conclusion: theoretical learning cannot be separated from practical field learning. Therefore, we propose the production and validation of an e-book that helps multidisciplinary work to critically ill patients in emergency care in the context of the Multiprofessional Residency Program for Urgency and Emergency in Trauma at the Metropolitan Hospital of Urgency and Emergency. As benefits, we are able to produce material that meets the needs experienced in practice in the context of the Residency Program, in a format that is easy to consult and access, without intending to replace the basic literature in the area.