Elaboração e validação de protocolo de avaliação de competências clínicas para residentes do Programa Multiprofissional de Urgência e Emergência

Abstract

The Multiprofessional Residency in Health (RMS) is a lato sensu postgraduate course and aims to train professionals to work in the SUS in a different way, as it develops interdisciplinary construction, teamwork and the reorientation of logics in these individuals. techno-assistance. Each course has its peculiarity, but assessment is an integral part of the teaching process. The evaluation of the residents must take place through the interaction between educators and the student, in a procedural way, seeking to identify problems that arise during the teaching-learning process and to solve them. The present study aimed to develop and validate a protocol to assess the clinical competences of residents of the Multiprofessional Urgency and Emergency Residency Program. This is a methodological study, of an applied nature, which included bibliographic research and a quantitative approach. The project was considered by the Research Ethics Committee of the University Center of the State of Pará (CESUPA) and approved under Nº 4,815,821, CAAE: 47940821.0.0000.5169. Data collection started only after approval, and the signing of the Free and Informed Consent Term (ICF) by the research participants. The individuals were studied respecting the norms of research involving human beings, according to Resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council, the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki. The target population of this study consisted of current preceptors and residents of the Trauma Urgency and Emergency Multiprofessional Residency Program, in addition to other professionals identified with expertise in the area (judges), as they constitute the public that uses the instrument to evaluate (preceptors) or to monitor their performance during the course (residents). The collected data were entered into an electronic spreadsheet using the Microsoft Office Excel 2019 and BioEstat 5.5 programs, and results with p≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. As the instrument was validated in relation to the proposed item (content) in the first evaluation round, obtaining an overall S-CVI of 0.99, a new evaluation was not required from the judges. The overall objective was successfully achieved. It is concluded, therefore, that this study contributed significantly to the evaluative practice of residents, carried out by preceptors, clarifying for residents and preceptors the items evaluated, in an objective and transparent way.