A forma de indicação e nomeação de ministros para o Supremo Tribunal Federal: estudo comparado em busca de um modelo ideal

Abstract

The objective of this academic research is to analyze the current model of appointment and nominations of Ministers of the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court, given that, over the years, right and left parties end up nominating people to safeguard their own interests or beliefs, which it can end up colliding with legal certainty, with impartiality and, especially, with the satisfaction of the public interest and with republican ideals. Presidential nominations have proven to be merely subjective and not very technical. Through a comparative study that uses as reference other models of Supreme Courts and Constitutional Courts and a doctrinal and historical analysis of the current model, it is concluded that there is a need to change to an ideal model by PEC - Proposed Amendment to the Constitution -, which safeguards a coherent and technical composition of the STF and the participation of other powers in the choices of Ministers.