Navegando por Assunto "Processo penal"

Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4

O caso Olga Benário sob a Fórmula de Radbruch: uma análise jurídica
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2019-06-04) Todde, Monique Melo; Nascimento, Yúdice Randol Andrade; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2711805209472107; Alves, Verena Holanda de Mendonça; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6473788796313910
The present case study deals with various themes, all of them linked in a philosophical concept corresponding to a main theoretical reference. The main idea came from the knowledge and acess to the full content of the Habeas Corpus n° 26.155/1936 – Case Olga Benário, in diligences next to the File Section of Coordination of Document Management and Institutional Memory of Federal Supreme Court, wich is attached to this work. The work was, in essence, directed to the letter that corresponds to “Five Minutes of Legal Philosophy”, a circular that Gustav Radbruch addressed to the Heidelberg University academics, published in the edition of september 12, 1945. The effective concept of justice is discussed, the historical background linked to the theoretical reference and if the case was judge correctly back them, or whether it could be done otherwise. The concept of Access to Justice in a context of clear regime of exception in the face of the historical aspects that guided the trial and its due circumstances, is a striking feature of this extremely controversial theme for his time, mainly due to the jurisdictional burden conferred by the STF. For finish, the question will be respond by the premise that unjust law is not law. The goverment of Getúlio Vargas complied the law, treating the judgment of Olga Benario as unilateral, so that it will be argued that justice did not occur in this trial.
Limites do princípio da presunção de inocência em face do Ministério Público
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2019-06-03) Silva, Ricardo Coelho da; Farias, Klelton Mamed de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5520066652510124; Lima Filho, Eduardo Neves; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6648186048235225
This monograph uses the limits of presumption of innocence and the features of public ministry. The first chapter organizes the general aspects of principle of innocence presumption and also, the features of public ministry and functions in the brazilian criminal process. The second chapter clarifies objective and subjective limits of presumption of innocence, considering also the public ministry representant, other and parts of process, a example the police authority and the judge, on situations that restrict the principle reach. The third chapter demonstrated the moments during the process (in broad sense) where the presentation of representant of public ministry meant restrictions to the subjective limits of principle, as example the presentation of report and the restrictions on subjectives limits, where the own law predict the distance of principal. Ultimately, on fourth chapter it see situations on criminal process (broad sense) where the punisher pretention is removed, keeping the presumption of innocence in the imputed, happening as example on the archiving request of police survey or on obsolution request, on the final allegations. From this, it is concluded for the mutability done by the representative of the public ministry, that can happen voluntary as those two examples mentioned, or impositively, as example, the acquittal judgment criminal that will prevent punisher pretension.
Relato de pesquisa: a verdade no processo penal sob a perspectiva da hermenêutica gadameriana
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2018-06-20) Azevêdo, Maria Carolina Braz da Silva; Lima Filho, Eduardo Neves; Neves, Rafaela Sena Teixeira
This is a research report made during the Law course at the “Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará - CESUPA”, since the second semester with the discipline of “Introdução ao Estudo do Direito II” and is still in continuity. The research aims to discuss aspects of criminal procedure law in a perspective of constitutional guarantees from the point of view of hermeneutics, based on the theoretical reference of Hans-Georg Gadamer, in order to propose, through a discussion of philosophical theoretical aspects, solutions for practical problems of rights violations in criminal proceedings. As a result until this moment, we have obtained the publication of an article in the “Revista de Estudos Criminais”, wich has “Qualis A1”.
A utilização do material genético descartado como prova no processo penal e a não autoincriminação
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2019-05-30) Souza, Sabrina Brenda de Oliveira; Lima Filho, Eduardo Neves; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6648186048235225; Nogueira, Rafael Fecury; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7341684103082113
This work aims to emphasize the figure of the accused within the criminal field, regarding the principle of non-self-incrimination, also known as Nemo Tenetur se Detegere, a development of the right to freedom against the force and punitive power of the State. This principle will be applied to the means of obtaining evidence, and in specific, DNA expert evidence. Thus, this study sheds light on the defendant's right to oppose the criminal justice system, in accordance with the principles of Human Dignity and the Federal Constitution of 1988. The debate specifies the circumstances of the DNA test even with the refusal of the passive subject to collaborate. The objective is to discuss the motivation and consequence of the relativization of the right to non-self-incrimination, in an attempt to find a solution that better reflects justice in the concrete case, without unreasonably authorizing unlimited state action, or impunity. In this sense, the work was done from the bibliographical analysis, from the doctrines of the criminal field, and from Brazilian jurisprudential review.