Navegando por Assunto "Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos"

Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3

A vida da população tradicional da etnia Xikrin frente ao empreendimento S11D e o entendimento da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2022) Pereira, Alisdéa Lice de Carvalho Jennings; Bentes, Natália Mascarenhas Simões; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7841149596245216; Sá, João Daniel Macedo; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9744534971209709; Simões, Sandro Alex de Souza; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2124140489726435
Brazil, being a multi-ethnic and pluricultural country, from the beginning of its development to its sovereign state, has as a premise, in its federal magna, to defend and value its heritage and its ethnic and regional diversity; and still, having as a guide the zeal in the maintenance and promotion of the guarantees of human rights in the diverse collectivities. Furthermore, as a legal support mechanism, Convention 169 of the ILO contemplates indigenous and tribal peoples, it is in force and deals with the consolidation of the right to prior consultation by indigenous peoples, in order to reduce disparities in power relations present in the neoliberal State. The advent of this convention provided the foundation for the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which seeks to promote and protect human rights respecting indigenous peoples. Vale, in the State of Pará that, according to reports, audits and expertise, legal claims, has promoted social and environmental impacts to its villages, thus urging the need to promote specific studies; such as the Prior Consultation, Study of Indigenous Component, to investigate due violations of legal mechanisms related to the stages of environmental licensing, as well as the discussion to support the implementation of consultation protocols for these communities, through the creation and implementation of a monitoring committee and joint follow-up between the Xikrin and the managers of the S11D project, for the inspection and elaboration of public policies that respect the human rights of the Xikrin people.
Análise comparativa sob a perspectiva de Gadamer da decisão do Supremo Tribunal Federal no caso Raposa Serra do Sol e da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos no caso Mayagna Awas Tingni: direto ao acesso às terras indígenas
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2016) Ferreira, Elaine Freitas Fernandes; Freitas, Juliana Rodrigues; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0679636700210902; Fonseca, Luciana Costa da; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3383269305393137; Benatti, José Heder; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0592012548046002
This thesis aims at a critical analysis from the perspective of Gadamer decisions of the Supreme Court in the case of the Raposa Serra do Sol and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case Mayagna Awas Tingni versus State of Nicaragua, with regard to the demarcation of indigenous lands. From the debate on the constitutional treatment of the right of indigenous lands as a key indigenous collective rights, and the Union's role in protecting those interests, questioned the logic of the right of access to lands in private and collective, as well as the legal treatment of indigenous before the Constitution of 1988. The review Gadamerian of the cases, was the decision of the Raposa Serra do Sol, a paradigmatic judged. Of that judgment, we can extract, by the Supreme Court, a search to legitimize the procedure character by declaring its action within the limits of an argumentative representation, since the main controversies raised regarding the framework of its final decision revolved around call conditions or restrictions imposed by the Minister Carlos Alberto Menezes law, the model established by the Union, the continuous demarcation of indigenous lands. The case of the indigenous community Mayagna Awas Tigni vs. the State of Nicaragua was submitted to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and aimed to the court statement to say that the Mayagna Awas Tingni has the right to access to ancestral lands. Finally, the analysis of these decisions through the concept of tradition Gadameriano and fusion of horizons, we find that not only addressed the interpretation of the text, but to interpret human history by breaking the positivist decisions tradition and past horizons merger with gift.
Após 20 anos da aceitação da competência da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos pelo Brasil: uma análise da fundamentação dos casos Gomes Lund Vs. Brasil (2010) e Herzog e Outros Vs. Brasil (2018)
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2019-06-14) Aragão, Amanda de Oliveira; Bentes, Natália Mascarenhas Simões; Fadel, Anna Laura Maneschy
En virtud de que Brasil se sometió a la competencia contenciosa de la Corte Interamericana en 1998 y fue condenado en 2010 con el caso Gomes Lund y otros Vs. Brasil ("Guerrilla del Araguaia") y en 2018 la Corte Interamericana dictaminó que condenó en el caso Herzog y otros Vs. Brasil, la presente monografía enfrenta la siguiente problemática: en qué medida los 20 años de la sumisión de Brasil a la Corte Interamericana fueron imprescindibles para el juicio de los casos Gomes Lund y otros Vs. Brasil y Herzog y otros Vs. Brasil ?. De esta forma, el objetivo es presentar que en esos 20 años hubo alteración relevante de la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Interamericano. Para ello, se realiza un análisis jurisprudencial comparativo en el que se eligió, entre los más pertinentes, un caso por año que versó sobre desaparición forzada o Ley de Amnistía que fueron sentenciados por el Tribunal Interamericano durante esos 20 años. Sin embargo, antes de entrar en el fondo de las decisiones es necesario examinar la evolución del Derecho Internacional Público y los reflejos de esa evolución en la protección de los derechos humanos, precipitadamente en la efectividad de esos derechos. Así como, analizar la fundamentación utilizada por la Corte Interamericana para reprender la desaparición forzada y la incompatibilidad de la Ley de Amnistía con el Pacto de San José. Además, es necesario comprender la imprescindibilidad de la existencia de precedentes para la plausible responsabilización de Brasil, las decisiones del Tribunal Interamericano han progresado para cada vez más humanitario. Por último, en virtud de las decisiones del Tribunal Interamericano poseer un carácter vinculante, es criticado el no cumplimiento total de los referidos juzgados por Brasil hasta los días de hoy, mientras que éste no demuestra la plena aplicación del derecho internacional de los derechos humanos.