Pós-Graduação

URI Permanente desta comunidadehttps://repositorio.cesupa.br/handle/prefix/4

Navegar

Agora exibindo 1 - 6 de 6

O controle judicial do incidente de resolução de demandas repetitivas: reflexos perante a administração pública e um novo padrão de relação entre os poderes no constitucionalismo brasileiro do século XXI
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2017-08-25) Neves, Felipe Portella; Araújo, José Henrique Mouta; Góes, Gisele Santos Fernandes; Dias, Jean Carlos
This research intends to analyze the influence of the decision of the Group Order Litigation, created by the Civil Litigation Code of 2015, over the public administration, mode specifically over the administrative bodies, organs and regulatory agencies that are affected by the formation of the legal thesis fixated in the respective incident, according to article 985, paragraph two of the Civil Litigation Code of 2015. With the inefficiency of the State to fulfill the functions incumbent on it, there is a perceptible increase in the judicialization, in which increasingly important issues are being decided by the Judiciary, especially when the legislature and executive cease to act or act unduly. On the other hand, the effect of the judicialization has generated the massification of conflicts, which generated the need to recognize rights with a predominantly collective dimension to contribute mainly to the treatment of the dissemination of individualized rights, which have homogeneity traits among them. However, the work will demonstrate that the collective mechanisms created by the legislations were insufficient to combat mass litigation of a homogeneous nature, failing to contain the multiplication of actions promoted in the judiciary, especially those originated by the same legal-factual question. Therefore, it was necessary, under the laws of Germany and England, to create, through the Civil Procedure Code (Law no. 13.105 / 15), the Incident of Resolution of Repetitive Demands to facilitate the processing and judgment of mass demands properly. This procedural instrument, however, because it has a strong binding character, before the judiciary and the public administration, has been questioned about the possible violation of the principle of separation of powers. In spite of doubts about its constitutionality, the present work will demonstrate that the incident seeks to break the traditional paradigm of separation of powers, based on the premises of Montesquieu, in as much as it proposes to achieve an integration between the powers (Legislative, Executive and Judiciary), through conciliation, communication and cooperation.
A eficiência como fundamento jurídico da decisão judicial e o estado de coisas inconstitucional: uma abordagem crítica à luz do debate de Ronald Dworkin e Richard Posner
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2018) Leite, Geraldo Neves; Dias, Jean Carlos; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3343295176890460; Brito Filho, José Claudio Monteiro de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7823839335142794; Timm, Luciano Benetti
This master’s thesis proposes a study on the role of efficiency within the Law. It aims to propose an investigation into efficiency as a legal standard to be followed by judges when making judicial decisions. The issue is relevant, as it seeks to describe and confront the problem of the crisis of efficiency of the jurisdictional provision, notably, when it comes to dealing with complex issues involving the realization of fundamental rights. The question of the use of efficiency as the basis of the judicial decision has been increasingly debated on the national scene. Although the Brazilian legal system is still strongly linked to legal positivism, there is a growing tendency for an interdisciplinary relationship between Law and Moral Philosophy, Economics, Politics and Sociology, to deal with complex judicial cases. Given this national situation, then, the question arises as to whether the efficiency of judicial decisions can be applied by investigating whether this traditional tool of economics has ethical and moral value and can therefore be considered a legal principle. The judge - and this is a concrete reality in Brazilian law - is increasingly called upon to make judicial control of public policies and, in this scenario, he has to position himself on the effectiveness of fundamental rights. It happens that the realization of these rights not only involves its fundamentality, but also the analysis of its cost, because we live - and our country, due to a strong political and economic crisis, is not far from it - in an environment of scarcity of resources. So the distribution of assets and resources also has to be evaluated by the judge, because at the moment of the judicial decision, he acts not only as controller of a public policy, but also as an occasional legislator and implementer of a substitutive public policy. In this context, he has to position himself on the distribution of assets and resources and the analysis of the efficiency of the decision, as has been pointed out, is important because the decision will generate reflexes not only for the parties to the process, but also for society.
O IRDR como política pública judiciária: a proteção ao princípio da igualdade a partir da adequada representação
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2018-02-05) Menezes, André Beckmann de Castro; Araújo, José Henrique Mouta; Dias, Jean Carlos; Guedes, Jefferson Carlos Carús
The incident of resolution of repetitive demands (IRDR) was created by the Legislative Branch as a judicial public policy, aiming to reduce the number of lawsuits in process, directly reaching the repetitive issues arising mainly from mass legal relations. Its foundations are the constitutional principles of celerity (efficiency), legal security (predictability) and equality (uniformity of decisions). Despite being a consequentialist instrument, the IRDR is an innovative Brazilian creation, inspired by several foreign institutes, that aims at the establishment of legal theses on controversial issues to guarantee the constitutional principle of material equality. The same jurisdictional provision for parties in identical factual-legal situations is a consequence of the application of material equality. The different procedural treatment given to all the subjects affected by the uniformity of the legal theme also stems from the same principle. Because it has the nature of a repetitive collective process, its rules need to be understood differently from those applicable to the traditional individual process. The re-signification of the principle of equality, therefore, was made based on Marcelo Neves’ theory of circularity between principles and rules, also absorbing the theory of systems of Niklas Luhman. The self-referential legal system, limited by the Federal Constitution, allows the principle (equality) to guide the norms (IRDR) and, at the same time, to receive its meaning. The juridical system, at the same time, heteroreferent, also allows the principle to be explained by external values (contingencies) of the surrounding world (public policies). This understanding requires the applicator of the norm to take some cautions already authorized in the system, especially with the publicization and with the choice of model cases, in order to provide adequate representation. Comparative Law is an important source of evolution in the act of processing IRDR in protection of material equality.
O poder judiciário como indutor de políticas públicas de saúde
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2017) Barros, Elaine Cristina Lopes; Dias, Jean Carlos; Brito Filho, José Claudio Monteiro de
This master’s thesis proposes a study about the Judiciary’s role in the creation, formation and implementation of public health policies. It demonstrates that the Public Power through public policies must guarantee the health to all citizens, and that, from the transforming role of the Judiciary, as part of a democratic-participatory State, if the State, by means of other Powers, refuses to provide this constitutional right, the population has the possibility to avail itself of the jurisdictional safeguards apt for the defense of the right to health for the realization of its Right, so that the means necessary for its dignity are guaranteed. In these terms, this Power has been led to adjust by means of decisions that oblige the Executive Power to attend to the litigant's claim, either by providing him with medicines or by offering the opportunity to perform exams, surgeries and treatments. It is known, however, that such participation runs against various interests resulting from the principle of separation of powers, from administrative discretion, as well as from obstacles to its implementation by economic and financial claims, as well as from non-recognition of individual ownership of this right, and these arguments are usually managed to prevent or reduce said participation. It is evident in the study that none of these arguments is sufficient to limit the interference of the Judiciary in matters related to the right to health, so that such participation becomes necessary for this fundamental right to be fully guaranteed, according to several decisions made by the Federal Court of Justice. It is also evident that, although recently this Court has recognized the general repercussion in two extraordinary appeals that deal with the supply of high-cost drugs not available in the Unified Health System (SUS) list and drugs not registered in the National Agency of (ANVISA), where the votes cast by Ministers Barroso and Fachin have put in check all this expansion of the limits of the Judiciary, which is exactly in the need of protection of fundamental rights, is believed in a final judgment capable of allowing, by means of the arguments set out here and the decisions made previously by the STF, that this extension is not deprecated, since the achievement of the individual as a human being is the first objective of the State, which is why it must be fully and effectively guaranteed. Considering that the aforementioned extension should not be unrestricted, given the limits imposed by the rules themselves and in order to avoid any abuse of power, criteria capable of guiding judgments handed down by magistrates will be demonstrated.
O princípio da cooperação e a responsabilidade dos entes da federação sobre a gestão de resíduos sólidos: análise da região metropolitana de Belém-PA
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2017) Cardoso, Adriana Luna; Fonseca, Luciana Costa da; Dias, Jean Carlos; Oliveira, Maria Cristina César de
In the face of industrialization process, mass production and consumption were obtained, generating, consequently, an increase in the volume of solid waste. What causes environmental impacts to the planet. With the advent of the National Policy on Solid Waste nº 12.305/2010, there was an important gap in the Brazilian environmental legislation. But, the proper management of solid waste is a great challenge that needs to work together between the different spheres of public power, the business sector and the community, according to the principle of cooperation. The purpose of this dissertation is to investigate the criteria of competence distribution and the responsibility of the federation entities, in the hypothesis of the creation of Metropolitan Regions, in view of the principle of cooperation. It analyzes the controversy around the distribution of competences for the provision of basic sanitation services, and in particular, solid waste disposal by agglomerated municipalities, and compliance with the principle of cooperation among the entities of the federation for shared participation aiming at Management of solid waste. The research uses the experience of the metropolitan region of Belém to apply the theoretical analysis and concludes that the responsibility is shared among the actors involved, but it does not prevent the individualization of objective civil liability to agents that perform behaviors harmful to the environment.
O uso dos precedentes judiciais no brasil: uma análise crítica a partir da teoria do direito e da argumentação jurídica
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2014) Lima Filho, Eduardo Neves; Dias, Jean Carlos; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3343295176890460
Gradually, we see the closeness between the legal systems of common law tradition and the civil law tradition, a true fusion occurring between these traditions. In other words, increasingly we see continental law working with judicial precedents and common law allocating matters to be regulated by laws or codes. The Brazil, despite unquestionably being a country of civil law tradition, each day begins to give more importance to judicial precedents, however, apparently without concern for the consolidation of institutions and mechanisms underlying a theory of judicial precedent. In this context and based on the democratic rule of law and concern for the protection and enforcement of fundamental rights of the democratic state and the containment of state arbitrariness, especially the arbitrariness in the Judiciary, we will seek to answer the question of whether the incorporation of a theory of judicial precedents in the Brazilian legal system corresponds to mere procedural technique, which may or may not be present in the legal system, aiming, among others, to speed up the judicial or corresponds to democratic requirement in the rule of law and has significant role in the system legal, independently of legal theory adopted, considering that these always relate to a theory of legal argument, which is anchored to some degree on a theory of judicial precedent. To do this, this paper will be the bibliographic research, among which the analysis of the works of Ronald Dworkin and Neil MacCormick, especially with regard to their contributions to the development of legal arguments in the context of judicial precedent.

Navegar

Navegando Pós-Graduação por Autor "Dias, Jean Carlos"