Pós-Graduação

URI Permanente desta comunidadehttps://repositorio.cesupa.br/handle/prefix/4

Navegar

Agora exibindo 1 - 5 de 5

A eficiência como fundamento jurídico da decisão judicial e o estado de coisas inconstitucional: uma abordagem crítica à luz do debate de Ronald Dworkin e Richard Posner
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2018) Leite, Geraldo Neves; Dias, Jean Carlos; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3343295176890460; Brito Filho, José Claudio Monteiro de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7823839335142794; Timm, Luciano Benetti
This master’s thesis proposes a study on the role of efficiency within the Law. It aims to propose an investigation into efficiency as a legal standard to be followed by judges when making judicial decisions. The issue is relevant, as it seeks to describe and confront the problem of the crisis of efficiency of the jurisdictional provision, notably, when it comes to dealing with complex issues involving the realization of fundamental rights. The question of the use of efficiency as the basis of the judicial decision has been increasingly debated on the national scene. Although the Brazilian legal system is still strongly linked to legal positivism, there is a growing tendency for an interdisciplinary relationship between Law and Moral Philosophy, Economics, Politics and Sociology, to deal with complex judicial cases. Given this national situation, then, the question arises as to whether the efficiency of judicial decisions can be applied by investigating whether this traditional tool of economics has ethical and moral value and can therefore be considered a legal principle. The judge - and this is a concrete reality in Brazilian law - is increasingly called upon to make judicial control of public policies and, in this scenario, he has to position himself on the effectiveness of fundamental rights. It happens that the realization of these rights not only involves its fundamentality, but also the analysis of its cost, because we live - and our country, due to a strong political and economic crisis, is not far from it - in an environment of scarcity of resources. So the distribution of assets and resources also has to be evaluated by the judge, because at the moment of the judicial decision, he acts not only as controller of a public policy, but also as an occasional legislator and implementer of a substitutive public policy. In this context, he has to position himself on the distribution of assets and resources and the analysis of the efficiency of the decision, as has been pointed out, is important because the decision will generate reflexes not only for the parties to the process, but also for society.
O incidente de resolução de demandas repetitivas e a atuação das agências reguladoras: eficácia e impactos jurídicos
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2023) Santos, Talita Danielle Fialho Messias dos; Dias, Jean Carlos; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3343295176890460; Araújo, José Henrique Mouta; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0717263241559819; Góes, Gisele Santos Fernandes; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1305423832262115
This master's thesis proposes a study on the impact of the court decisions made in the context of an incident of resolution of repetitive demands (IRDR) on the regulatory agencies, according to § 2o, of art. 985, of the Civil Procedure Code. It is a practical research, with a qualitative approach, having as methodological procedures the bibliographical and documental review. Under the premises of the theory of law, the research had its foundations based on modern legal positivism, having as a theoretical reference the North American author Ronald Dworkin. Regarding the civil procedural aspect, the main authors that served as the basis for the research were Paulo Sarno Braga e Rafael Alexandria de Oliveira, Sofia Orberg Temer e Thomas da Rosa de Bustamante. This paper seeks an investigation into the normative force of judicial precedents, especially the IRDR, given the possibility of the incident projecting its effectiveness to regulatory agencies, according to § 2o of art. 985, of the Civil Procedure Code. The issue is relevant given that IRDR is still a novelty in the legal system, in addition to the fact that the legislator has left gaps in its regulation, raising doubts among law enforcers, with the need to unify the understanding on the subject. To facilitate this research, a case study was used (IRDR n. 0801251-63.2017.8.14.0000 of the Court of Justice of Pará, that questions the fairness of the collection of unregistered consumption of past period by Equatorial (formerly Celpa). Finally, it was found that judicial precedents have normativity, which, however, may vary in effectiveness depending on the type of precedent. In the specific case of the IRDR, although it has binding effectiveness within the Judiciary (horizontal and vertical), by express legal determination (art. 927, III, of the Civil Procedure Code), this effectiveness could not extend to regulatory agencies considering an analysis of law as integrity. Therefore, it is necessary to confer to § 2o of art. 985, of the Civil Procedure Code, an interpretation according to the Constitution and, by corollary, consider its effectiveness persuasive only.
O poder judiciário como indutor de políticas públicas de saúde
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2017) Barros, Elaine Cristina Lopes; Dias, Jean Carlos; Brito Filho, José Claudio Monteiro de
This master’s thesis proposes a study about the Judiciary’s role in the creation, formation and implementation of public health policies. It demonstrates that the Public Power through public policies must guarantee the health to all citizens, and that, from the transforming role of the Judiciary, as part of a democratic-participatory State, if the State, by means of other Powers, refuses to provide this constitutional right, the population has the possibility to avail itself of the jurisdictional safeguards apt for the defense of the right to health for the realization of its Right, so that the means necessary for its dignity are guaranteed. In these terms, this Power has been led to adjust by means of decisions that oblige the Executive Power to attend to the litigant's claim, either by providing him with medicines or by offering the opportunity to perform exams, surgeries and treatments. It is known, however, that such participation runs against various interests resulting from the principle of separation of powers, from administrative discretion, as well as from obstacles to its implementation by economic and financial claims, as well as from non-recognition of individual ownership of this right, and these arguments are usually managed to prevent or reduce said participation. It is evident in the study that none of these arguments is sufficient to limit the interference of the Judiciary in matters related to the right to health, so that such participation becomes necessary for this fundamental right to be fully guaranteed, according to several decisions made by the Federal Court of Justice. It is also evident that, although recently this Court has recognized the general repercussion in two extraordinary appeals that deal with the supply of high-cost drugs not available in the Unified Health System (SUS) list and drugs not registered in the National Agency of (ANVISA), where the votes cast by Ministers Barroso and Fachin have put in check all this expansion of the limits of the Judiciary, which is exactly in the need of protection of fundamental rights, is believed in a final judgment capable of allowing, by means of the arguments set out here and the decisions made previously by the STF, that this extension is not deprecated, since the achievement of the individual as a human being is the first objective of the State, which is why it must be fully and effectively guaranteed. Considering that the aforementioned extension should not be unrestricted, given the limits imposed by the rules themselves and in order to avoid any abuse of power, criteria capable of guiding judgments handed down by magistrates will be demonstrated.
Selos distintivos na cadeia produtiva da pecuária: o direito à informação e a rastreabilidade da carne bovina no estado do Pará
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2023-02-16) Torres, Lígia Ohashi; Dias, Jean Carlos; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3343295176890460; Fonseca, Luciana Costa da; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3383269305393137; Brandão, Juliana Lira da Silva e Cunha; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2942620289684800
Cattle ranching began in the Brazilian state of Pará in the context of a policy, favored by military regimes, of occupation of the Brazilian Amazon that was widespread into the 1980s. Beginning in the 1990s, faced with environmental problems linked to production chains and health crises tied to food production, a new business cycle arose that was marked by the search for environmentally and socially appropriate actions and by assurances of quality and proper sourcing of products. In this context, the application of ESG agenda to ranching, in addition to mitigating production process risks and aiding conformity with sustainability standards, could bring greater awareness to beef production. A central factor in this process consists of implementing transparency in the production chain, carrying out animal tracking, in order to ensure the legality of production. In 2002 in Brazil, a system of cattle tracing was started which, nevertheless, is mandatory only for animals destined for export. For the internal market, there is still a need to improve tracking systems in order for consumers to truly have complete, reliable information about the provenance of the beef they consume. Certification is one of the mechanisms that can serve this purpose and provide consumers with information about the production process. Distinguishing labels make it possible to certify both the quality and origin of products, giving value to producers and ensuring food safety. In light of this, the study proposes to analyze how distinguishing labels can be used as a mechanism to combat the lack of traceability in the beef production chain in Pará and violations of consumers’ right to information. The specific objectives are to present the history of the beef production chain in Brazil, especially in the case of the state of Pará, characterizing the current and future structure of the chain via application of ESG principles; to understand the use of distinguishing labels for agricultural products and their relation with traceability in the beef production chain; and, lastly, to demonstrate how a consumer’s right to information contributes to food safety. This study will use deductive reasoning, with bibliographic research and access to secondary data. It is hoped that this survey will contribute to a rise in the quality of beef in the state of Pará.
O uso dos precedentes judiciais no brasil: uma análise crítica a partir da teoria do direito e da argumentação jurídica
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2014) Lima Filho, Eduardo Neves; Dias, Jean Carlos; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3343295176890460
Gradually, we see the closeness between the legal systems of common law tradition and the civil law tradition, a true fusion occurring between these traditions. In other words, increasingly we see continental law working with judicial precedents and common law allocating matters to be regulated by laws or codes. The Brazil, despite unquestionably being a country of civil law tradition, each day begins to give more importance to judicial precedents, however, apparently without concern for the consolidation of institutions and mechanisms underlying a theory of judicial precedent. In this context and based on the democratic rule of law and concern for the protection and enforcement of fundamental rights of the democratic state and the containment of state arbitrariness, especially the arbitrariness in the Judiciary, we will seek to answer the question of whether the incorporation of a theory of judicial precedents in the Brazilian legal system corresponds to mere procedural technique, which may or may not be present in the legal system, aiming, among others, to speed up the judicial or corresponds to democratic requirement in the rule of law and has significant role in the system legal, independently of legal theory adopted, considering that these always relate to a theory of legal argument, which is anchored to some degree on a theory of judicial precedent. To do this, this paper will be the bibliographic research, among which the analysis of the works of Ronald Dworkin and Neil MacCormick, especially with regard to their contributions to the development of legal arguments in the context of judicial precedent.

Navegar

Navegando Pós-Graduação por Orientador "Dias, Jean Carlos"