A dessubjetivação terapêutica: um estudo do dispositivo criminal-punitivo dos inimputáveis por doença mental

Abstract

This thesis aims to understand the discursive rationalities built by criminal device-punitive measure of security. From the debate around the desubjectivation treatment of the insane offender, I questioned the logic of the legal treatment of be imputable by mental illness. This desubjectivation sustains the loss of autonomy of subjects and justify public policies increasingly securitarian and interventional, highlighting in a dramatic way the exercise of biopower and the economic rationality of entrepreneurial contemporaneity. The perception of madness as unreasonableness and the relations between knowledge and power that conspicuousness to psychiatry to the category of science, desubjectivate the individual madman in virtue of not subjection to fixed identity of the modern subject, justifying systems of exclusion. In the context of the new rationality modern legal, why punitive disciplinary action and reason biopolitics articulate producing the neutralization of individuals harmful to the market, which would explain the admission of crazy for an indefinite period of time. The situation of public policies of security measure in the State of Para, shows us need to make them through the grid of intelligibility of economic rationality neoliberal. Finally, the analysis of discursive practices of judges and forensic psychiatrists, I noticed that the inquiry "who is the subject?" appears behind the records of abnormality and dangerousness of the crazy, showing us to be precise, before everything, questioning the status of the subject legacy by Modernity and the relations of domination and subordination of defining ways to see and recognize subject in contemporary societies.