Análise comparativa entre o método tradicional e a metodologia BIM para um projeto estrutural: estudo de caso

Abstract

The choice between the BIM (Building Information Modeling) methodology and the traditional method in structural projects represents a crucial inflection point for construction professionals and companies in the market. Both approaches have significant implications in terms of efficiency, collaboration, and results, reflecting the constantly evolving paradigms in the construction industry. In this context, it is essential to analyze and understand which of these options best adapts to the different stages of the project. The present work aims to develop and compare a structural project, between the traditional resource and the BIM methodology, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each method. To carry out this study, the architectural design of a two-story single-family residence was chosen, in which the structural design was carried out using the traditional method following all the necessary steps, therefore the same step was carried out using the BIM methodology. The comparison to highlight the main differences between the systems was made following the essential points that guide a project, starting from research, time measurement and analysis of results. The BIM methodology proved to be more advantageous in the productivity, integration, detailing, maintenance, coordination, and management of a structural project. However, the initial cost of software and project time are higher than the traditional method. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out a careful analysis of specific needs before starting to implement each method.