Navegando por Assunto "Precedentes judiciais"

Filtrar resultados informando as primeiras letras
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    Aplicação de precedentes judiciais vinculantes no processo administrativo
    (Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2019-06-07) Ferreira, Elter Paulo; Silva, Arthur Laércio Homci da Costa; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5467964111383727; Silva, Adelvan Oliverio; http://lattes.cnpq.br/8410285154382694
    The advent of Code of Civil Procedure of 2015 (CPC) brought a new system of judicial precedents inserted in article 927 do CPC which establish that every judge must respect precedents. The judicial precedents effect is changing slowly from persuasion to biding. There are arguments contrary and favorable to precedent application, for instance, independence of the judge on the contrary side and legal certainty on the favorable side. However, regarding Public Administration, which is part of the Democratic State, the same way that the Judiciary is, there is no forecast at on the CPC to application of binding judicial precedents. That way, the object of this study will be the effect of the judicial precedent, especially the binding established in art. 927 of the CPC, regarding to the administrative process, by which the Public Administration expresses its will. This study starts with the delimitation of precedes, its possible effect, as well as clarifies the difference between common law and stare decisis, passing through the analysis of the reasons for application and non-application of precedents and, in the end, the study analyze the possibility of the application of the theory of judicial precedents for the administrative process, and reaches a conclusion on that matter.
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    O uso dos precedentes judiciais no brasil: uma análise crítica a partir da teoria do direito e da argumentação jurídica
    (Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2014) Lima Filho, Eduardo Neves; Dias, Jean Carlos; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3343295176890460
    Gradually, we see the closeness between the legal systems of common law tradition and the civil law tradition, a true fusion occurring between these traditions. In other words, increasingly we see continental law working with judicial precedents and common law allocating matters to be regulated by laws or codes. The Brazil, despite unquestionably being a country of civil law tradition, each day begins to give more importance to judicial precedents, however, apparently without concern for the consolidation of institutions and mechanisms underlying a theory of judicial precedent. In this context and based on the democratic rule of law and concern for the protection and enforcement of fundamental rights of the democratic state and the containment of state arbitrariness, especially the arbitrariness in the Judiciary, we will seek to answer the question of whether the incorporation of a theory of judicial precedents in the Brazilian legal system corresponds to mere procedural technique, which may or may not be present in the legal system, aiming, among others, to speed up the judicial or corresponds to democratic requirement in the rule of law and has significant role in the system legal, independently of legal theory adopted, considering that these always relate to a theory of legal argument, which is anchored to some degree on a theory of judicial precedent. To do this, this paper will be the bibliographic research, among which the analysis of the works of Ronald Dworkin and Neil MacCormick, especially with regard to their contributions to the development of legal arguments in the context of judicial precedent.