Navegando por Assunto "Escala de Likert"
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
- Resultados por página
- Opções de Ordenação
Item Análise do aprendizado de anatomia humana em um curso de medicina com Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas (ABP)(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2019) Marques, Igor Gabriel; Cunha, Victor Menezes da; Penha, Nelson Elias Abrahão da; Oliveira, Wellington Pinheiro de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4902455106917702; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5207645183090927Objective: This paper aims to analyze the perception of learnig in human anatomy of the medical student along the PBL method in differents cycles of the course (basics and clinics). Method: This is an analytical and descriptive cross-sectional study wich have analyzed data obtained through a questionnaire, with directs responses using the Likert scale, applied to CESUPA’s students of the fifth and eighth semesters of the medical course, between november 2018 and march 2019. Results: When the answers was decomposed individually for questions per class, it was verified independence through the G-test. There were statistical significance for the questions 7 “Are you sure that the anatomical study developed through the active methodology, up to this moment of the course, was enough to complete the thematic modules?” (p = 0,0007), being the alternative B the most checked by the two classes and 8 ”Do you believe that the knowledge learned unitl here will be usefull for the practice at your profession as a general physician?” (p = 0.036), being the alternative A, the most checked by the two classes, then, the alternative B. The remaining questions were not statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: The medical studens who learn anatomy through the PBL at CESUPA feel safe about the support of this subject in their way as a general practitioner and has a good degree of agreement that the learning developed in anatomy, was sufficient for the conclusion of each thematic module.Item Liderança como fator orientador para a construção de gestão estratégica de pessoas: um estudo comparativo entre duas empresas em Belém do Pará(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2023-06-26) Beirão, Graziela Azevedo; Sousa, Hugo Rodrigues de Oliveira; Silva, Joyceane Moreira da; Nobre, Pedro Paulo Macedo; Oliveira, Márcia Cecília Rodrigues de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9031699274609496; Cereja, Fabiola Alves; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4434149523451690Companies have leaders who combine efforts and collaborators to achieve organizational objectives, in which the role of leadership is aimed at increasing and directing productivity and process efficiency, envisioning the maximization of results. Given the importance of the leader in business, this study aimed to identify the leadership style that is presented as a guide in the construction of the strategic management of people in organizations. A comparative case study was carried out between two açaí processing companies located in the city of Belém-PA. To obtain the information, semi-structured interviews and questionnaires applied to the leaders and followers of both companies were used as a data collection instrument. As for the results obtained in the study, it was identified that the leader of company A has a dynamic and active profile in the work environment, always seeking to be close to his team of subordinates and giving all the necessary support to the team in achieving results. It can be inferred that the transformational profile identified in the management of the company's leader generates total satisfaction of the team and leads the company to a high market, financial and organizational performance, since the general average obtained through the analysis of the Likert scale was 4,56 and with the application of empowerment in the team. It was also noted that the leader of company B has an aggressive and sometimes intimidating imposing profile towards his commanded employees. The autocratic profile identified, in addition to not generating team satisfaction, does not generate commitment and effort for greater organizational achievements, since the general average obtained through the analysis of the Likert scale was 2.31, a score well below expectations. The comparative study of the two cases showed that transformational leadership favors the effectiveness and the achievement of tangible and intangible returns for the company and is presented as the best option in team management in companies that seek competitive advantage with the formation of high-quality teams performance.