Navegando por Assunto "Direito"

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2

O direito como agente normalizador dos direitos humanos LGBTI
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2018-12-19) Souza, Ana Carolina Rodrigues de; Azevedo, Thiago Augusto Galeão de; Galeão, Camyla
This paper seeks to analyze if the Law is a guarantee instrument of rights or just a normalizing discourse ruled by a logic of domination of bodies LGBTI. Initially, it sought to analyze briefly the concepts of sexuality, sex and gender, from the theoretical reference of Michel Foucault, in order to demonstrate that such concepts are results of a social construction. Through the explanation of the Queer Theory, it seeks the deconstruction of innate and stable concepts arising from a discourse endowed with heteronormativity, focusing on the individual who escapes the heterosexual binarism. Thus, it is sustained the sexuality as a construction, in the form of a device responsible for the creation of an idea of biological sex, as well as the production of multiple sexualities, which had to be named and cataloged for controling purposes. In a second moment, it investigates the relationship between Law, Power and the Truth incident on the sex, in order to verify if the Law is a normalizable surface by the alluded power and truth and, therefore, normalizing. For that, it approaches the Law from the identification of a normalized-normalizing image crossed by the power and the constructed truth about the sex. The third moment, it establishes, with all the above, how the Law presentes itself as a normalizing tool in the creation, implementation and expansion of public policies, such as the Social Name ID, and specific spaces such as the "Third Bathroom", aiming to encompass the individuals who escape the binary and heterosexual logic imposed by the sexuality device. By the end, this work has joined one of the images of the Law, which Foucault called as the "new Law".
Intervenção humanitária unilateral ou crime de agressão? uma análise da intervenção americana no conflito sírio
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2018) Proença, Camilly Gouvea; Bentes, Natália Mascarenhas Simões; vvvvvvvv; Neves, Rafaela Teixeira Sena
La paralysie du Conseil de Sécurité des Nations Unies (CSNU) par rapport à la Syrie a fait que certains pays adoptent des mesures plus incisives unilatéralement, sous le discours de la protection des droits de l'homme et du droit international humanitaire. Cependant, cette intervention en plus de mettre en échec la légitimité du CSNU, est légalement contestable. Cette monographe a le but d'analyser quelle sont les limites entre l'intervention humanitaire unilatéral et le crime d'agression. A partir de la conception contemporaine de la souveraineté et responsabilité de protéger, on passe à l'analyse des interventions humanitaires, avec emphase sur les unilatérales. Fait ces considérations, sera fait une étude sur la définition du crime d'agression, pour faire un comparatif entre le crime d'agression et les interventions humanitaires unilatérales. Finalement, sera fait une analyse sur l'intervention nord-américaine dans le conflit en Syrie, ayant par référence le bombardement qui a eu lieu le 6 avril 2017, ainsi que le bombardement du 13 avril 2018. Enfin, il est possible de conclure que les interventions militaires conduit unilatéralement, en plus d'être incompatible avec la Charte des Nations Unies, peut facilement configurer un crime d'agression, mais malgré les aspects matériels, il y a une grande difficulté à atteindre la responsabilité internationale pour le crime d'agression, en vertu des questions de procédure et d'une résistance politique.