Navegando por Assunto "Ativismo judicial"

Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4

A atuação contemporânea do STF: a fragilização do princípio da separação dos três poderes
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2023) Silva, José Adriano Paiva; Lima, Lucas Do Couto Gurjão Macedo; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5423158402903671
El objetivo de este trabajo fue analizar cómo el principio de separación de poderes ha evolucionado a lo largo del tiempo como concepto y cómo el papel del STF en sus decisiones en los últimos años ha aumentado su evidente injerencia en las atribuciones de los demás poderes de la República. Se trató de una monografía derivada de investigaciones bibliográficas en libros, artículos científicos impresos y en línea, reportajes periodísticos, legislación y jurisprudencia. En esta investigación se analizaron inicialmente los fundamentos teóricos que sustentan el concepto de poder, recorriendo su trayectoria evolutiva hasta llegar a la cúspide del poder político. Comenzamos entonces a demostrar quiénes fueron los principales teóricos que desarrollaron este concepto dentro de la filosofía política. Luego discutimos el papel del poder judicial en la época contemporánea, la judicialización de la política y el activismo judicial. Finalmente, buscamos exponer a través de dos casos concretos y emblemáticos cómo el STF viene decidiendo en temas de interés social, en el primer caso mostramos un ejemplo de cómo actuó cumpliendo su papel de guardián de los principios constitucionales, aún cuando la ley en vigor su sentido literal regula valores contrarios a los principios constitucionales. Y en el segundo caso, mostramos un ejemplo de cuando el STF violó claramente estos principios y fue más allá de sus competencias constitucionales al atribuirse prerrogativas que crea en su reglamento interno, pero que no están previstas en la Constitución Federal.
Análise da estrutura pela qual se desenvolve o ativismo judicial brasileiro no âmbito do Supremo Tribunal Federal
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2018-12-14) Xavier, Danilo Pereira; Oliveira, Adriano Carvalho; Peixoto, Carla
The judicial activism of the Federal Supreme Court is a current topic whose discussion goes beyond the legal framework. It is observed that the Supreme has been assuming in the last years important political and social role. Subjects with high moral content, controversial, drivers of Brazilian life, have been decided by this Court. Faced with this fact, it is imperative to study the judicial activism that develops within the scope of the Pretório Excelso, because it is a question of studying the decision-making behavior of the one who has the last word in the interpretation of constitutional norms in Brazil. In this context, the present work will focus on the analysis of some activist decisions of the 21st century that involve themes from the most diverse branches of society. To do so, we will first make an exposition about the elements necessary to understand the theme. Then, it will be shown which role falls to the Supreme within the Brazilian constitutional logic. And, later, some emblematic activist decisions will be analyzed. Finally, it will be noted that these decisions reveal, above all, the intrusion of the STF into the sphere of action of the other Legislative and Executive Powers, putting in check the principle of tripartition of Powers and the functionality of the check and balances system.
Os hard cases no direito ambiental: análise sobre a atuação do judiciário perante casos difíceis (hard cases) em matéria ambiental e o ativismo judicial como instrumento de justiça compensatória
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2021) Melo, João Victor Feio; Brito, Luís Antônio Gomes de Souza Monteiro de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2244189950353544
This work analyzes the great debate on judicial activism, but with an approach to environmental law and how this aspect influences justice and the violation of constitutional precepts that are the basis of security and separation of powers and their autonomy. In its scope, it carries out the conceptualization of judicial activism in order to demonstrate its unconstitutionality in difficult cases (hard cases), and this term is clearly explained for the purpose of understanding and understanding. It also brings criticism based on the constitutional guidelines themselves, and that to follow the activist path is to go against the precepts of the Democratic State of Law and thus enter into a paradox. But also, to bring an analysis to the environmental issue and how activism has become a compensatory instrument to nurture a "justice" that is helpless, but it is a misalignment on the part of the Judiciary in constitutional guidelines, in relation to the superposition of principles on the rules and the consideration of these principles as general rules in their analyses. Concluding with a synthesis of the study surrounding all the details and arguments put forward to support this action of the Judiciary Power before the Legislative Power and the Constitution.
Precedentes judiciais vinculantes no Código de Processo Civil de 2015, ativismo judicial e (in) segurança jurídica
(Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2018) Feio, Thiago Alves; Cichovski, Patrícia Kristiana Blagitz
The Civil Procedure Code of 2015 (CPC) introduced profound reforms in the Brazilian legal system, among which is the system of binding precedents, aimed at easing the crisis that the Judiciary has passed since the promulgation of the 1988 Constitution, represented mainly by procedural delays and legal uncertainty. The first one is represented by the number of cases, with 79.7 million cases pending, and by the enormous duration of judicial proceedings, on average of 5 years and 10 months. The latter is evident with a diversity of decisions for similar cases. The study proposes the questioning: is the system of binding precedents of the CPC, as introduced and taking into account the Brazilian context, a tool capable of limiting judicial activism and promoting legal security in Brazil? With the objective of analyzing the suitability of binding precedents to provide legal security in the country. This analysis proposes a comparative study with common law principles, through a bibliographical review of books and articles on the subject, where it is possible to question the importation of this system, without proper adaptation. It is clear that a number of conceptual determinations and structuring are necessary in order for binding precedents to be able to give satisfactory prestige to legal certainty. Regarding the conceptualizations, the use of precedents may raise doubts as to which part of the decision will be linked, which body will be responsible for the specification of that part and which model of application of precedents. This lack of definition can intensify activism in the country by expanding the margin for discretion. With regard to the structures, there are operational gaps, due to the lack of a reporting system in the Brazilian legal system, in order to set up a specialized committee to extract the elements, in a schematic form, from the decision. Another missing structure is the lack of an organized tool for consulting the precedents. Therefore, the system of precedents requires a structural organization and a debate for conceptual definition, aiming to compensate for the lack of culture of respect for judicial understandings, lacking a project to foster respect for and continuity of judicial decisions.