Pós-Graduação

URI Permanente desta comunidadehttps://repositorio.cesupa.br/handle/prefix/4

Navegar

Navegando Pós-Graduação por Orientador "Dantas, Elza Ezilda Valente"

Filtrar resultados informando as primeiras letras
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    Avaliação interpares: experiência de avaliação formativa no curso de enfermagem em uma instituição de ensino superior de Belém
    (Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2020) Santos, Isabela Bonfim; Dantas, Elza Ezilda Valente; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3951303999926297; Barreto, Bruno Acatauassú Paes; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4741205865293040; Nunes, Leonardo Mendes Acatauassú; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3512764081076675; Peixoto, Ivonete Vieira Pereira; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0072766773987067; Carvalho, Ana Emília Vita; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1981562999898097; Reis Junior, Leandro Passarinho; http://lattes.cnpq.br/8106073837131437
    This research questioned the theme Educational Evaluation, specially evaluation in superior degree learning. In academic scenery highlighted three functions from de evaluation to the learning: the diagnostic, the total amount and the formation. The formative evaluation aims to develop the constructive action and compromised to the learning, content in the evaluation inter-pairs the possibility to share responsibilities and work on the mobilization of the knowledge handling it to the abilities and attitudes. Objectives: valid a form of inter-pair evaluation aim to contribute to the practice of formative evaluation in the nursery course. Apply the instrument of inter-pair evaluation in hospital nursery module in the range; to know the students` perceptions about the tools of inter-pair evaluations. Problems searched: How do inter-pair evaluation might help in the development of effective and collaborative learning from the perception of the students? How does it characterize the perception of the students about inter-pair evaluation as part of the evaluation? Methodology: descriptive qualitative research in which the participants were students of 4th period of the course. Presenting the following methodological stages: presentation of the project to the group, conversation exposing what is formative evaluation, with the focus on the inter-pairs evaluation: accompanying classes with active methodologies and application of questionnaire to students, in which data will be submitted to analyses of the content. Results: most of the students (55,6%) believe in the potential of formative evaluation, but there are still many challenges to overcome, what leads to not always to feel safe to give feedback to the colleagues. 38,9% totally agree that feelings, such as feel safe, motivation, trust are demonstrated in contacts with colleagues, sharing knowledge and experience in a collaborative activity. although after passing through the process of inter-pairs evaluation after the use of active methodologies 38,9 experienced aversive feelings when faced the responsibilities about the learning of the other participants of the group. 50% agreed to have facilities to identify the deficiencies and potencies of their colleagues because the use of active methodologies help to individualize the needs of the students when working in groups, become easier the interaction student - teacher. Conclusion: we concluded that the way the students evaluate themselves, noticed that their learning, refer to the progresses, related to the objectives of learning, and drew new steps to learning constituted, the first references about the applications of tools of inter-pairs evaluation in the course and what it is capable to mobilize when we want a shared responsible learning. The scientific experience of the present study, the references in which we observed the effects of formative evaluation and the validation of the inter-pairs evaluation forms aim to contribute to the nursery course aiming the logic dialogical capable to recognize the potentialities, the fragilities and the possibilities of changing in the learning process.
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    O peer instruction (instrução por pares) como estratégia metodológica no ensino-aprendizagem da reanimação neonatal
    (Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, 2020) Costa, Edilene Silva da; Dantas, Elza Ezilda Valente; Pinto, Ana Rachel; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2268370803567328; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3951303999926297; Barreto, Bruno Acatauassú Paes; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4741205865293040; Magno, Ismaelino Mauro Nunes; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3841081216551678; Reis Junior, Leandro Passarinho; http://lattes.cnpq.br/8106073837131437; Teixeira, Renato da Costa; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3506765836592906; Carvalho, Ana Emília Vita; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1981562999898097
    The theme The Peer Instruction (Peer Instruction) as a Methodological Strategy in the Teaching-Learning of Neonatal Resuscitation is linked to the research line of the teaching-learning process in the medical field, and aims at the methodological debate about the training of Resuscitation, currently based in its theoretical section, in traditional methodologies, through lectures, observing a great disinterest of the students. In this sense, try to seek alternatives for the teaching-learning process, used in the experimental character of the active PI methodology, associated with the Socrative online voting system, Objectives: to evaluate the level of learning, satisfaction and motivation about the neonatal resuscitation course, comparing students' estimates of traditional methodology and PI; Methodology: the subjects of this research were undergraduate medical students from the 5th year of CESUPA (Centro Universitário do Pará), studying the practical module of pediatrics at Hospital Divina Providência, where a research was carried out. The students were divided into four classes, two of which received traditional training and two received PI training, as classes were randomly randomized by students, a data collection was carried out over the six-month period (March to August/2019), were investigated through answers in the selection test of the neonatal resuscitation course choice, all students after a capacity response in a likert type questionnaire with their opinions on the methodologies employed. Results: the answers to the questions showed a similar level of learning in the two methodologies during the first round of voting, but in the second round, where the answers were 30-70%, the students talked to their peers and voted again, generating a statistically difference significant (p = 0.0065 *). It was observed that both methodologies are positive in training. The PI group achieved a statistically significant outcome in the answer I totally agree (p = 0.0325 *), the students of both methodologies disagree, mostly, that there are learning barriers in relation to the applied methodologies, and the PI group obtained a difference statistically significant in the answer I totally disagree (p = 0.0465 *). The theme that obtained the greatest statistical difference was the motivation generated in IP (p = 0.0021 *). The online voting carried out by the Socrative application was evaluated only by students in the PI group with a very significant statistical result in relation to their positivity (p = 0.0001 *). Conclusion: The PI achieved promising results, confirming itself as an innovative methodology, capable of generating significant learning.